Facebook “Games.”

I’m somewhat dismayed by society and its acceptance the definition of the word “game.”

200 million potential players and THIS is what you get?!

200 million potential players and THIS is what you get?!

From http://www.merriam-webster.com

  • 1 a (1) : activity engaged in for diversion or amusement.

Is that really all there is to it? I mean by that definition isn’t whistling to yourself a game? So, thanks to Facebook we now have games on our social networking sites. But are these truly games or are they creatively designed money pits?

Venture capitalists have invested approximately $98 million in social game companies last year. Another scary, yet interesting fact about social network gamers, they exceed the total number of users for World of Warcraft and Xbox Live combined (Gamasutra). What we have here is a potentially very powerful and very lucrative audience. Yet what are we seeing? Games where the only way you advance, currently, is to spend real world dollars. Now if this practice was exercised in the main stream gaming market their would be angry mobs and journalists leading the charge with scathing editorial reviews of their products. Yet it not only survives in social networking platforms it thrives.

What is the difference between main stream games and social networking games besides the silly cash for fun system in place in the majority of the titles? About 15-20 years. Main stream audiences were playing titles like the ones on these popular sites that long ago. Yet on a 200 million subscriber network that’s what is being peddled. The iPhone has a smaller subscriber base and you would think far less powerful hardware than what is possible on a server somewhere. Currently you can play browser based FPS and MMO games. Now just looking at those, without even trying them you can immediately tell the difference from this.

Quake Live plays IN your browser window.

Quake Live plays IN your browser window.

Browser based MMORPG.

Browser based MMORPG.

Now I’m not saying that you’ll have more fun with these games than you will with the social network achievement sharing style. What I am saying is, is that 200 million people deserve a higher standard. Because if there was a game like this available to me through Facebook right now I’d have hard time justifying downloading or buying any other kind of product.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Facebook “Games.”

    • I’m assuming this is an Oceanic based site. The quality is amazing but over here in the states the connection is very lagged.

  1. So by that definition, if I amuse myself during a doctor office wait by flipping through a pamphlet about STDs, what I’m really doing is playing a game.

  2. Hey, Nice post..But i think you have to add Mafia wars into your list. Anyway you did well. But it will make a large effect. Thanks for sharing information with us.

    • You’re absolutely right Mr. ds.
      Mafia Wars tries its best to remind us all of the old school text based games and in some ways it does have bits and pieces from that era of gaming. Where it falls flat on its face though is in its strange idea of getting more people to play unlocks more content. Makes the whole experience end up feeling like a big scam. Then you add on top of that micro transactions for in game “perks” which really aren’t perks at all since like like Farmville, Mafia Wars has no conclusion and no end game.

  3. Pingback: Civilization Comes to Facebook in 2010 « Books On… A Social Media Blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s